<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Schadenfreude &#187; finance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ralree.com/tag/finance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ralree.com</link>
	<description>Malicious enjoyment derived from observing someone else's misfortune</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 04:18:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Citibank says checks are cleared as soon as you see them online&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ralree.com/2009/08/10/22628/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ralree.com/2009/08/10/22628/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralree.com/?p=22628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I called Citibank tonight to confirm that one of my checks I deposited was finally collected.  This is a good thing to ask your bank if you are concerned that a check might bounce.  They indicated, as is said in the following audio recording, that if a check shows up in your transaction log online, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I called Citibank tonight to confirm that one of my checks I deposited was finally collected.  This is a good thing to ask your bank if you are concerned that a check might bounce.  They indicated, as is said in the following audio recording, <strong>that if a check shows up in your transaction log online, it&#8217;s cleared.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ralree.com/2009/08/10/22628/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.ralree.com/newblog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/stuff.mp3" length="4349039" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic representative introduces amendment to waste paper</title>
		<link>http://www.ralree.com/2009/05/01/democratic-representative-introduces-amendment-to-waste-paper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ralree.com/2009/05/01/democratic-representative-introduces-amendment-to-waste-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralree.com/?p=22584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) this proposed amendment:
  (d) MINIMUM TYPE-SIZE AND FONT REQUIREMENT FOR CREDIT CARD APPLICATIONS AND DISCLOSURES.-
All written information, provisions, and terms in or on any application, solicitation, contract, or agreement for any credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan, and all written information included in or on any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.opencongress.org/people/show/400163_luis_gutierrez">Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL)</a> this <a href="http://www.rules.house.gov/111/AmndmentsSubmitted/hr627/Gutierrez302ndrev_111_hr627.pdf">proposed amendment</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>  (d) MINIMUM TYPE-SIZE AND FONT REQUIREMENT FOR CREDIT CARD APPLICATIONS AND DISCLOSURES.-</p>
<p>All written information, provisions, and terms in or on any application, solicitation, contract, or agreement for any credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan, and all written information included in or on any disclosure required under this chapter with respect to any such account, shall appear-</p>
<p>      (1) in not less than 12-point type; and<br />
      (2) in any font other than a font which the Board has designated, in regulations under this section, as a font that inhibits readability.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting &#8211; I wonder how much extra paper that would waste every year, and how many more trees would be required to make it happen.  Is readability really a problem?  If one is blind, he/she can probably find help to read the terms (<a href="http://www.readthistome.org/">yes, they can</a>).  Funny enough, nothing this guy&#8217;s ever sponsored or co-sponsored has passed &#8211; so he&#8217;s zero for 44 as of today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ralree.com/2009/05/01/democratic-representative-introduces-amendment-to-waste-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Stimulus</title>
		<link>http://www.ralree.com/2008/10/12/another-stimulus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ralree.com/2008/10/12/another-stimulus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralree.info/2008/10/12/another-stimulus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, yet again the government thinks that it can fix all its problems by giving people the illusion that they have more money.  Thanks for the loan I&#8217;ll have to pay back in my taxes (or, worse, they will just inflate the currency to pay it out)!
I think I might just mattress (yes, I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yet again the government thinks that it can fix all its problems by <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aOGluZiry8zI&amp;refer=home">giving people the illusion that they have more money</a>.  Thanks for the loan I&#8217;ll have to pay back in my taxes (or, worse, they will just inflate the currency to pay it out)!</p>
<p>I think I might just mattress (yes, I&#8217;m using that as a verb) the money, or spend it on things one might need if we go into a depression, like long shelf-life food or ammunition.  Any thoughts on what might be good to purchase? (I also have no debt at all, so that&#8217;s not really an option for me like it is for 99% of the nation)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ralree.com/2008/10/12/another-stimulus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protectionism and Buying American</title>
		<link>http://www.ralree.com/2008/08/24/protectionism-and-buying-american/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ralree.com/2008/08/24/protectionism-and-buying-american/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralree.info/2008/08/24/protectionism-and-buying-american</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have recently been reading Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt, and in Chapter 11, Section 2, I found an interesting analysis of tariffs and how they actually hurt everyone except the special interest producer.  In his hypothetical example, the consumers pay more for the products, there is less export of American currency [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently been reading <a href="http://jim.com/econ/"><i>Economics in One Lesson</i> by Henry Hazlitt</a>, and in <a href="http://jim.com/econ/chap11p2.html">Chapter 11, Section 2</a>, I found an interesting analysis of tariffs and how they actually hurt everyone except the special interest producer.  In his hypothetical example, the consumers pay more for the products, there is less export of American currency to foreign countries, and therefore less export from America, and he even goes on in the following sections about wages decreasing as an effect of tariffs.</p>
<p>This has made me rethink &#8220;buying American,&#8221; which seems to be a big movement in today&#8217;s society.  If it is more expensive for me to buy from an American company, and I do it anyway, along with tens of thousands of other consumers, what are the actual effects?  That company doesn&#8217;t go out of business, yet some foreign company with cheaper equivalent products may, or at least it will lose profits, resulting in the increased unemployment in that country and a decrease in buying power of that country, affecting American exports.  If the option to buy the alternative is lost, the cost of the product to consumers increases, hurting working families in America.  The employees of the American company will keep their jobs instead of moving to other industries, which is seen as the motivation behind the choice to buy American.  But, the unseen result is that there is less <strong>American</strong> money in the pockets of the foreigners, money that has no purpose other than to be spent in America.  Therefore, by buying American, you are helping that single company at the expense of the minuscule loss to every American company that exports its products outside the country.  In reality, it doesn&#8217;t really matter if you buy American or not, since that money will probably not spend long in foreign circulation before it is re-used to buy American out of necessity.  The power of electronic circulation of currency these days is incredible.</p>
<p>Hypothetically, if I buy my Honda Civic instead of a Chevy Volt, what&#8217;s the difference?  When I purchase the Honda new, I am putting a few thousand dollars in the pockets of a Japanese company.  Dollars don&#8217;t work over there, so they need to change them into something else.  They have a few options:</p>
<ul>
<li>They can convert it into Japanese Yen, whose exchange rate today is 1 yen per 0.009101 U.S. dollars by selling the currency to an American entity.  This simply decreases the American holdings of the foreign currency, and injects the money right back into America.</li>
<li>They can convert it into Japanese Yen by selling it to another foreign country on a currency exchange, or by selling it domestically to a currency trader.  This probably happens to some extent, but it just represents one more extremely fast electronic hop through the global investing ether.</li>
<li>They can convert it into holdings in a US company, bonds, commodities, homes, or other US-based securities.  This helps our economy, allowing our companies to function, maintaining American employment directly.</li>
<li>They can loan it back to US entities and collect interest in dollars, which have to go through this process again (yes, I realize that bonds fit here, but I feel they fit better in the previous bullet).  Eventually, these all have to end up back in the pockets of Americans, and even lift the burden of risk from <strong>all</strong> American lenders.  If these loans are defaulted upon, it was simply a bad investment by the foreign investor, whose product <strong>and</strong> money we have now! </li>
<li>Finally, they can simply <strong><em>buy American</strong></em>.  Our exporters will benefit greatly by the increased spending, and will buy products being produced in America for lower prices than they can be found in Japan, necessarily adding to the efficiency of operation of the world market (otherwise, the exporters would go out of business).</li>
</ul>
<p>Note also that investing in foreign currency is a gamble.  It is definitely possible that a foreigner may sell us a Honda Civic today for $10,000, and 6 months from now inflation of the money supply (the M3 that the Fed doesn&#8217;t publish anymore, not the CPI, which is open to interpretation) will drive the purchasing power of those dollars lower, meaning by buying that car, we actually cheated the manufacturer out of some amount of buying power.  Therefore, if the car company wants to continue being profitable, it cannot keep its holdings in American currency for more than the short term, meaning it has to offload it, the most logical place being back to America, or to a Japanese currency trader, who will do the same.</p>
<p>All in all, I would almost encourage buying foreign to get rid of these <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;refer=home&amp;sid=aN.FfcMPXR10">worthless pieces of paper</a> as quickly as possible.  Let the foreigners deal with our ruined currency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ralree.com/2008/08/24/protectionism-and-buying-american/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redhat looks exciting</title>
		<link>http://www.ralree.com/2007/10/08/redhat-looks-exciting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ralree.com/2007/10/08/redhat-looks-exciting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralree.info/2007/10/13/redhat-looks-exciting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like Redhat is about to rally

Stock up if it goes past $21!  It could really zoom.  The support is built up long term.  I signed up for an options account with Scottrade today.  It will allow me to:

Buy puts and calls to open
Write covered calls

It&#8217;s too bad they don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>It looks like Redhat is about to rally</h2>
<p><img src="http://ralree.info/assets/2007/10/8/rht.png" alt=""/></p>
<p>Stock up if it goes past $21!  It could really zoom.  The support is built up long term.  I signed up for an options account with Scottrade today.  It will allow me to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Buy puts and calls to open</li>
<li>Write covered calls</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad they don&#8217;t offer naked put writing and selling to close.  I would have liked to play the game of just trading pure options without ever exercising them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ralree.com/2007/10/08/redhat-looks-exciting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NKTR for the win!</title>
		<link>http://www.ralree.com/2007/10/06/nktr-for-the-win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ralree.com/2007/10/06/nktr-for-the-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralree.info/2007/10/13/nktr-for-the-win</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After looking through hundreds of stocks, I think I might check this one out:

It looks technically promising.  We&#8217;ll see how that turns out.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After looking through hundreds of stocks, I think I might check this one out:</p>
<p><a href="http://ralree.info/assets/2007/10/6/poo.jpg"><img src="http://ralree.info/assets/2007/10/6/poo_thumb.jpg" alt=""/></a></p>
<p>It looks technically promising.  We&#8217;ll see how that turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ralree.com/2007/10/06/nktr-for-the-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citibank Greasemonkey Plugin for Firefox/Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.ralree.com/2007/09/06/citibank-greasemonkey-plugin-for-firefox-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ralree.com/2007/09/06/citibank-greasemonkey-plugin-for-firefox-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citibank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greasemonkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[userscripts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralree.info/2007/10/13/citibank-greasemonkey-plugin-for-firefox-linux</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Citibank is lame &#8211; they don&#8217;t think that Firefox in Linux is a supported browser, but seem to believe that it is under Windows and OSX.  Well, good thing we have Greasemonkey around.



// ==UserScript==
// @name           Citibank Continue
// @namespace      [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Citibank is lame &#8211; they don&#8217;t think that Firefox in Linux is a supported browser, but seem to believe that it is under Windows and OSX.  Well, good thing we have Greasemonkey around.</p>
<div class="CodeRay">
<div class="code">
<pre><code>
<span class="c">// ==UserScript==</span>
<span class="c">// @name           Citibank Continue</span>
<span class="c">// @namespace      http://www.ralree.info</span>
<span class="c">// @description    Makes the Citibank browser warning page go away</span>
<span class="c">// @include        https://web.da-us.citibank.com/cgi-bin/citifi/portal/l/l.do</span>
<span class="c">// ==/UserScript==</span>
<span class="pt">document</span>.getElementsByTagName(<span class="s"><span class="dl">'</span><span class="k">input</span><span class="dl">'</span></span>)[0].click;
</code></pre>
</div>
</div>
<p>Get it <a href="http://ralree.info/assets/2007/9/6/citibankcontinue.user.js">here</a>.  As you can see above, it does nothing dangerous.  Just clicks the damn button for you so you never have to see the <strong>unsupported browser</strong> screen again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ralree.com/2007/09/06/citibank-greasemonkey-plugin-for-firefox-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.373 seconds -->
