<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Schadenfreude &#187; blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ralree.com/tag/blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ralree.com</link>
	<description>Malicious enjoyment derived from observing someone else's misfortune</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:49:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Making WordPress live in a subdirectory</title>
		<link>http://www.ralree.com/2009/02/18/making-wordpress-live-in-a-subdirectory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ralree.com/2009/02/18/making-wordpress-live-in-a-subdirectory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralree.com/?p=22174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found an interesting article today about WordPress.  It was how to make it live in another directory. I needed that, so I followed the instructions, and it worked. WordPress is so much easier to install and configure than Mephisto.  It&#8217;s even easier to use than Mephisto.  I can see almost no reason anyone would want to use Mephisto anymore, other than nostalgia &#8211; WordPress has really cleaned up its act.  It seems the most recent public vulnerabilities to it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found an interesting article today about WordPress.  It was how to <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Giving_WordPress_Its_Own_Directory">make it live in another directory.</a> I needed that, so I followed the instructions, and it worked.  WordPress is so much easier to install and configure than Mephisto.  It&#8217;s even easier to use than Mephisto.  I can see almost no reason anyone would want to use Mephisto anymore, other than nostalgia &#8211; WordPress has really cleaned up its act.  It seems the most recent public vulnerabilities to it were apparently <a title="way back in 2.3" href="http://blogsecurity.net/2007/05/27/blogwatch/">way back in 2.3</a> (I&#8217;m on 2.8).  So, I recommend my readers either get some hosting and start their own installation, or jump over to <a href="http://www.wordpress.com">WordPress.com</a> and make one of their own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ralree.com/2009/02/18/making-wordpress-live-in-a-subdirectory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annoying Web 2.0 Stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.ralree.com/2008/07/01/annoying-web-2-0-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ralree.com/2008/07/01/annoying-web-2-0-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ralree.info/2008/07/01/annoying-web-2-0-stuff</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever wondered what it would be like if no one ever upgraded to Web 2.0? I mean, really, what have we gained. Here&#8217;s a list of things that I personally find really stupid about the phenomenon&#8230; Have you ever wondered what it would be like if no one ever upgraded to Web 2.0? I mean, really, what have we gained. Here&#8217;s a list of things that I personally find really stupid about the phenomenon: Lists I think there&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever wondered what it would be like if no one ever upgraded to Web 2.0?  I mean, really, what have we gained.  Here&#8217;s a list of things that I personally find really stupid about the phenomenon&#8230;</p>
<p>            <span id="more-13038"></span></p>
<p>Have you ever wondered what it would be like if no one ever upgraded to Web 2.0?  I mean, really, what have we gained.  Here&#8217;s a list of things that I personally find really stupid about the phenomenon:</p>
<h1>Lists</h1>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a list for everything now.  Everyone wants to be David Letterman.  Here&#8217;s a lists of lists of things, found on Digg by searching for &#8220;10 things&#8221;:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.geekarmy.com/geekblog/politics/top-10-things-americans-want-but-cant-have/">Top 10 Things Americans Want but Can’t Have</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.psychologytoday.com/rss/pto-20030823-000001.html">Procrastination: Ten Things To Know</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/bi/confessions/archives/technologist-manifesto-or-things-everyone-in-it-should-know-7715">Things Everyone in IT Should Know</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5020306/things-no-one-gives-microsoft-credit-for-but-should">Things No One Gives Microsoft Credit For (But Should)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.thelandsalmon.com/lifestyle/16-names-of-things-you-never-knew-had-names.html">16 Names Of Things You Never Knew Had Names</a></li>
<li><a href="http://eightandfive.com/2006/11/02/stay-on-target/">Things Republicans want you to forget</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Now, lists are all fine and dandy, but nowadays, most lists people put up are simply a ploy to get traffic, show more ads, and make money.  Now, I have no problem with this at all &#8211; profits are the best incentive.  But, really, it&#8217;s getting a little insane.  Instead of lists, which are easy to skim, why not hide all your points in some real writing?  Many of my friends and I, who are internet addicts, have realized that our reading speed and comprehension have suffered over the years due to the way we surf, which is skimming everything for that small chunk of information you want.</p>
<h1>Social Bookmarking Icon Diarrhea</h1>
<p>This picture says it all:</p>
<p><img src="http://ralree.info/assets/2008/7/1/annoying_icons.png" alt="Stupid Icons"/></p>
<h1>Really Big RSS Feed Images</h1>
<p>
<img src="http://ralree.info/assets/2008/7/1/rsspo1.png" alt=""/></p>
<h1>Giant Footers</h1>
<p>Here&#8217;s one:</p>
<p><a href="http://louisville.edu/"><img src="http://ralree.info/assets/2008/7/1/uglyfooter_medium.jpg" alt=""/></a></p>
<p>Nobody looks at the bottom of your site.  Sorry.</p>
<h1>Lame Layouts</h1>
<h2>How to waste 2/3 of the screen</h2>
<p><img src="http://ralree.info/assets/2008/7/1/4124-medium.jpg" alt=""/></p>
<h2>How to waste 3/4 of the screen</h2>
<p><img src="http://ralree.info/assets/2008/7/1/3016-medium.jpg" alt=""/><br />
<img src="http://ralree.info/assets/2008/7/1/2822-medium.jpg" alt=""/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ralree.com/2008/07/01/annoying-web-2-0-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

